How to fix employee resistance to change

The take home? Trust in management is the absolute number one requirement for reducing employee resistance to change. Breach trust at your peril.

Background and Context

Organisations increasingly need to adapt quickly to external changes, as exemplified by the challenges posed by COVID-19. However, change often triggers employee resistance, which can stem from a lack of necessary skills, insufficient consultation, or negative past experiences. This resistance can have costly implications, including increased stress, absenteeism, and even project failures. The infamous failure of the UK National Health Service’s e-health project, costing approximately £12.5 billion, is a stark example of the high stakes involved.

Antecedents of Resistance

The study delves into antecedents like participation and communication, which have historically been seen as key to reducing resistance. However, evidence supporting this is mixed. Communication can sometimes inadvertently highlight reasons to resist, and participation may offer opportunities to oppose change. Thus, the relationship between these factors and resistance is complex and nuanced.

Resources and trust in management also significantly influence resistance. Adequate resources support successful change, and trust in management consistently reduces resistance across various contexts. Individual attributes like future clarity and personal resilience are important too. Employees who can vividly imagine their future are less resistant to change, and those with higher resilience tend to support change more.

Paradoxical Leadership and Change Management

Paradoxical leadership, an approach that embraces ambiguity and balances contradictory skills, is emerging as a powerful tool in managing change. Leaders adept in this style can respond more effectively to the complex demands of organisational change, meeting both employee needs and change objectives.

Theoretical Framework

The research uses Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) as a framework, suggesting behaviour is driven by the interplay of personal and environmental factors. It posits that managerial actions, like providing resources and opportunities for participation should focus on building trust and future clarity, which in turn affect resistance to change.

Research Project and Conceptual Model

The research project, conducted from July to October 2021, aimed to test a conceptual model of resistance using scientific methods. The model suggested that organisational factors influence personal factors, leading to behaviour that supports or resists change. Data was collected through surveys of employees in NT government departments who had recently experienced organisational change. The responses were analysed using structural equation modelling in SPSS and R.

Statistical Analyses and Novel Findings

The analyses confirmed that employees with high trust in management, future clarity, and personal resilience show significantly less resistance. Organisational factors like resources, communication, and participation influence resistance by building trust and future clarity. Paradoxical leadership also plays a strong role in reducing resistance by positively influencing organisational factors.

Contrary to expectations, paradoxical leadership did not significantly affect employee resilience, and participation played a minor role in reducing resistance.

Implications for Organisations

The study underscores the paramount importance of trust in management in managing resistance. All modifiable organisational antecedents like resources, communication, and participation impact trust, which accounts for a substantial portion of employee resistance. The study also cautions against overreliance on participation as a means to reduce resistance, as its effects are variable and often indirect.

Communication emerges as the most influential factor under managerial control. Effective communication significantly impacts trust in management and future clarity, thus reducing resistance. Adequate resources also play a critical role, with their proper allocation improving trust and future clarity, thereby lowering resistance.

Future clarity is enhanced when employees have a clear vision of the future, which is influenced by resources and communication. Personal resilience, while influential, is less within the control of managers compared to trust in management and future clarity.

Finally, cultivating paradoxical leadership can be beneficial for organisations undergoing change. This style positively influences organisational factors, which in turn reduce resistance to change.

Conclusion

The study offers comprehensive insights into the dynamics of employee resistance to organisational change. Key factors like communication, resources, participation, trust in management, future clarity, and paradoxical leadership all interplay to shape employee attitudes towards change. By understanding and strategically managing these factors, organisations can more effectively navigate the complexities of change, reducing resistance and enhancing the likelihood of successful change implementation.

---